• Contact us
  • (888)-619-2000
  • About AppealTech
  • Services
  • Our Team
  • Resource Center
  • The AppealTech Blog
  • News & Events
  • FAQ
AppealTech – Your Appellate Partner
  • APPELLATE SERVICES
  • ELECTRONIC FILING
  • COMPLIMENTARY CLE
  • APPEALTECH PORTAL
  • About AppealTech
  • Services
  • Our Team
  • Resource Center
  • AppealTech Blog
  • News and Events
  • FAQ
  • Contact Us
  • (888)-619-2000
  • AppealTech App banner

What Does it Mean to “Settle” a Transcript?

Anna Hettwer First Department, Appellate Division, Second Department, Appellate attorney

As with most nomenclature in the legal profession, terminology can be misleading or often appear more confusing to the practitioner than need be. “Settling” the transcripts is one of these terms; “settling” a transcript is synonymous with “correcting” the transcript. Essentially, settling a transcript is predicated on the basis that the record on appeal must “contain all of the relevant papers that were before the Supreme Court, including the transcript, if any, of the proceedings.” Matison v. County of Nassau (2002) 290 AD2d 494, 495. An Appellant must provide the Court with the full transcript, otherwise the record on appeal may be deemed inadequate to enable the Court to reach a decision on the merits, and therefore require dismissal of the appeal. In order to settle the transcript, the Appellant must order and pay for a transcript of the minutes of the trial from the court reporter or transcribing service and make arrangements for the actual production of the transcript. This process is governed by Section 5525 of the CPLR. It is incumbent on the Appellant to be proactive and initiate the procedural steps required to finalize the transcript for the record on appeal.

The Content of the Record on Appeal Includes the Settled Transcript from the Trial Court

The Appellant is tasked with creating a compendium of all of the important documents from which the appeal is prosecuted. The required contents are set forth in CPLR 5526: “The record on appeal from a final judgment shall consist of the notice of appeal, the judgment-roll, the corrected transcript of the proceedings if a trial or hearing was held, any relevant exhibits, or copies of them, in the court of original instance, any other reviewable order, and any opinions in the case. The record on appeal from an interlocutory judgment or any order shall consist of the notice of appeal, the judgment or order appealed from, the transcript, if any, the papers and other exhibits upon which the judgment or order was founded and any opinions in the case.” [Emphasis added].

As set forth in the preceding code section, the corrected (remember, synonymous with “settled”) transcript of the trial proceedings are a necessary part of the record on appeal. In practice, this process is only necessary for transcripts of “proceedings” such as trials or hearings with sworn witnesses. Oral arguments on interlocutory appeals are not considered “proceedings” under this definition, and therefore transcripts of such arguments need not be settled.

Applicable Timelines (Remember the Magic Number “15”)

Pursuant to CPLR 5525 (a) the Appellant “shall serve upon the stenographic reporter a request for a transcript of the proceedings.” Within 15 days after receiving the transcript from the court reporter, or another source, “the appellant shall make any proposed amendments and serve them and a copy of the transcript upon the respondent.” CPLR 5525(c). In turn, the Respondent has 15 days after the service of the transcript to make any proposed amendments or objections to the proposed amendments of the Appellant, and subsequently the changes upon the Appellant. In practice, only the latter 15 day period is enforced. It is the rare case in which the Appellant is able to serve the transcript within 15 days of its receipt, due to delays in getting client permission to pursue the appeal or other strategic reasons for determining whether to incur the expense of starting the appellate process. 

There are a few scenarios to consider as to how the record is settled when the parties disagree on the proposed changes, or when the Respondent does not make any changes:

If the parties do not agree to the amendments, at any time thereafter, and on at least 4 days’ notice to the adverse party, the transcript and the proposed amendments (and objections thereto) are submitted for settlement to the judge or referee before whom the proceedings were had. The original transcript shall then be corrected by the Appellant in accordance with the agreement of the parties or the direction of the court. This “correctness” is certified by the parties, judge, or referee before whom the proceedings were held. This process is strongly disfavored as a burden on the trial court and should be avoided if it is at all possible for the parties to settle the transcript without the trial court’s intervention.

Alternatively, if the Appellant has timely proposed the amendments and served them with a copy of the transcript on the Respondent, and the Respondent has not made any changes within the applicable timeframe, the transcript along with the Appellant’s proposed amendments are deemed correct without the necessity of a stipulation by the parties certifying its correctness and without the need of judge or referee certification. The Appellant shall then affix to the transcript an affirmation, certifying compliance within the applicable time limitations, service of notice, and Respondent’s failure to propose amendments or objections. As with any important court documents, the Appellant must serve on respondent the following: a copy of the transcript with proposed amendments, a notice of settlement containing reference to subdivision (c) of CPLR 5525, along with a note that if the Respondent fails to propose amendments/objections, the transcript is deemed settled pursuant to code.

For Efficiency’s Sake, Submit a Stipulation with the Copy of the Transcript to Preempt Disagreements & the Need for Judicial/Referee Intervention

When serving the transcript and the 15 day notice, it is best practice to include a cover letter along with a proposed stipulation to settle the transcript. The stipulation can reflect the terms of the agreement between the parties. A draft stipulation that can be modified depending on the changes by the respective parties can go a long way in streamlining the settlement process.

What If there Is No “Stenographic” Transcript?

In the rare occasion that there is no stenographic record of the proceedings, the Appellant has 10 days after taking the appeal to prepare and serve upon Respondent a statement of the proceedings from the best available sources, including recollection, for use in lieu of a transcript. The Respondent then has 10 days to submit the proposed changes/objections. The statement with objections/amendments is to be submitted to the judge or referee before whom the proceedings were held. This is referred to as the “statement in lieu of stenographic transcript.”

Always Cross-Reference Your Particular Appellate Division for Department Specific Rules

Of course, it is always critical to check local rules for whichever department of the Appellate Division has jurisdiction over your case to ensure there are no department specific rules  that could affect the settlement of the transcript!

If you have any questions about any of the Appellate Division rules, please don’t hesitate to contact AppealTech at (212) 213-3222 or info@appealtech.com.

 

  • Email

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Cancel reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    popular

    • Deferred Joint Appendix 2CC (NW)
    • How to digitally file motion and application papers in appeals that are not subject to e-filing in the New York Appellate Division, Fourth Department
    • Communicating and Interacting with the Courts during Covid-19
    • Court Closures for Christmas and New Year’s holiday season
    • Expansion of E-filing in Appellate Division, First Department

    Categories

    • Appellate Division
    • United State Supreme Court
    • Federal Courts
    • California State Courts of Appeals
    • New York State Courts of Appeals

    Tags

    Amicus Brief Appeals Appellate attorney Appellate Division Appellee Appendix or Brief California Supreme Court Changes CJA CJA attorney CJA client CJA voucher consolidated Court of Appeals Criminal Justice Act electronic filing extension Federal Circuit federal court file an appeal First Department Fourth Department FRAP 30 FRAP 42(a) Local Rule 30.1 Nalco Co. v. Chem-Mod New York State Court of Appeals NextGen Notice of Appeal NY Appellate Divisions oral argument Patent Infringement Complaint Record Reverses Dismissal Rule rules update Second Circuit Second Department Statewide Practice Rules Supplemental Appendix Supreme Court Third Circuit third department § 670.5 § 670.20

    Counsel Press Inc. Acquires AppealTech

    Learn More

    AppealTech

    • 7 West 36th Street 12th Floor New York, New York 10018
    • (212) 213-3222
    • 8 Exchange Blvd. Suite 170 Rochester, NY 14614
    • (585) 802-9837
    • 520 S Grand Ave., Suite 360 Los Angeles, CA 90071
    • (213) 402-4890
    • info@appealtech.com
    Copyright © 2016 Appealtech.com
    Designed By:
    Copyright © 2016 Appealtech.com
    Terms of ServicePrivacy Policy

    Counsel Press Inc. Acquires AppealTech

    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
    New York, New York (February 4, 2021) – Counsel Press Inc., the nation’s largest appellate services provider, announced today that it has finalized its agreement to acquire AppealTech.

    AppealTech was founded in 1998 in New York by a group of appellate professionals focused on assisting law firms and their clients, government agencies and nonprofit organizations in perfecting their appeals in the New York Appellate Courts, the U.S. Circuit Courts of Appeals and the United States Supreme Court.

    “AppealTech has a proven track record of providing high-quality service to the legal community and has developed thousands of meaningful customer relationships,” said Scott Thompson, Chief Executive Officer and President of Counsel Press. “The acquisition of AppealTech further reinforces our position as the nation’s leading appellate services provider, with more than 83 years of experience in preparing, filing and serving appeals in all state and federal appellate courts nationwide. We welcome AppealTech’s team members to Counsel Press. Together we remain committed to providing exceptional service for all of our clients,” added Mr. Thompson.

    “AppealTech’s clients will experience a seamless transition and will continue to receive the same high standards of service and professionalism that they have come to expect,” said Michael Kestan, the former owner and President of AppealTech.

    Counsel Press has set the highest standard in appellate preparations since 1938, earning the title, The Appellate Experts®. We proudly provide accurate, precise and compliant filings to thousands of customers, filing over 12,000 appeals across all 50 states and all appellate jurisdictions annually.

    For more information about Counsel Press, or its acquisition of AppealTech, please contact Samantha Williams, Director of Marketing, at marketing@counselpress.com or call 800-4-APPEAL.

    CONTINUE